Excellence Awards

Adventist Nurses Aotearoa NZ (ANAnz) Nurses Symposium

Oral Presentation: Submission Criteria and Judging Rubric


Purpose

The Oral Presentation session celebrates the real, hands-on work being done by nurses in their churches, schools and communities. Applicants are invited to share how they use their nursing knowledge and expertise to reach, support and uplift the people around them, reflecting the symposium theme of 


Prize

$500, sponsored by ELIA Wellness, awarded to the winning presentation. The winning presentation must be grounded in genuine, current or recently completed work within the applicant’s community. It must not be a hypothetical, proposed or purely academic project.


Submission Requirements

  1. Word limit: Written submissions must be between 1,500 and 2,000 words. Submissions outside this range will not be considered.
  2. Real community work: The presentation must describe actual work the applicant is doing or has done within their church, school or community.
  3. Theme alignment: The submission must clearly connect to the symposium theme.
  4. Applicant details: Full name, contact details, place of work/study, and the community setting in which the work takes place.

Presenting at the Symposium

Finalists will have the opportunity to present their work at the Symposium within a 10 minute time frame. Finalists may use whatever medium best showcases their work, for example a slide presentation, video, storytelling, photographs, props or displays, or a combination of these. Presentations must be kept within the 10 minute limit.


Judging Criteria

#CriterionWhat judges are looking forWeight
1Alignment with the symposium themeThe presentation clearly and meaningfully connects to the theme of the ANAnz Nurses Symposium. The theme is woven through the work itself, not just mentioned in passing.20%
2Sharing knowledge and expertiseThe applicant demonstrates a strong understanding of what it means to share their nursing knowledge and expertise, using it purposefully to reach, educate and support people within their church, school or community.25%
3Whole-person health and wellbeingThe work reflects a whole-person approach to health: physical, mental, emotional, social and spiritual wellbeing are considered and addressed, not just clinical or physical health alone.25%
4Cultural diversity and inclusionThe applicant shows genuine understanding of cultural diversity and/or an ability to reach and care for people from different walks of life, with respect, humility and cultural safety.20%
5Authenticity and impact of real community workThe presentation is based on real work being done in the community, with evidence of genuine engagement and impact (stories, outcomes, participation and feedback).10%

Total: 100%


Scoring Scale (applied to each criterion)

ScoreDescriptor
5 (Excellent)Criterion is met fully and compellingly; clear depth of understanding and evidence throughout.
4 (Very good)Criterion is well addressed with only minor gaps.
3 (Good)Criterion is addressed adequately but lacks depth or detail in places.
2 (Fair)Criterion is only partially addressed; connection is weak or unclear.
1 (Poor)Criterion is barely addressed or missing.

Each judge scores all five criteria; scores are weighted and totalled. The highest overall weighted score wins. In the event of a tie, the panel will give preference to the submission demonstrating the strongest evidence of real community impact (Criterion 5).


Guidance for Applicants

Strong submissions will typically answer these questions:


Disqualification

Submissions may be excluded if they:


Prize proudly sponsored by ELIA Wellness.


Event Registration – click here to view the schedule

Event Scheduleclick here to view the schedule

Home Pageclick here for more info