Adventist Nurses Aotearoa NZ (ANAnz) Nurses Symposium
Oral Presentation: Submission Criteria and Judging Rubric
Purpose
The Oral Presentation session celebrates the real, hands-on work being done by nurses in their churches, schools and communities. Applicants are invited to share how they use their nursing knowledge and expertise to reach, support and uplift the people around them, reflecting the symposium theme of
Prize
$500, sponsored by ELIA Wellness, awarded to the winning presentation. The winning presentation must be grounded in genuine, current or recently completed work within the applicant’s community. It must not be a hypothetical, proposed or purely academic project.
Submission Requirements
Presenting at the Symposium
Finalists will have the opportunity to present their work at the Symposium within a 10 minute time frame. Finalists may use whatever medium best showcases their work, for example a slide presentation, video, storytelling, photographs, props or displays, or a combination of these. Presentations must be kept within the 10 minute limit.
Judging Criteria
| # | Criterion | What judges are looking for | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alignment with the symposium theme | The presentation clearly and meaningfully connects to the theme of the ANAnz Nurses Symposium. The theme is woven through the work itself, not just mentioned in passing. | 20% |
| 2 | Sharing knowledge and expertise | The applicant demonstrates a strong understanding of what it means to share their nursing knowledge and expertise, using it purposefully to reach, educate and support people within their church, school or community. | 25% |
| 3 | Whole-person health and wellbeing | The work reflects a whole-person approach to health: physical, mental, emotional, social and spiritual wellbeing are considered and addressed, not just clinical or physical health alone. | 25% |
| 4 | Cultural diversity and inclusion | The applicant shows genuine understanding of cultural diversity and/or an ability to reach and care for people from different walks of life, with respect, humility and cultural safety. | 20% |
| 5 | Authenticity and impact of real community work | The presentation is based on real work being done in the community, with evidence of genuine engagement and impact (stories, outcomes, participation and feedback). | 10% |
Total: 100%
Scoring Scale (applied to each criterion)
| Score | Descriptor |
|---|---|
| 5 (Excellent) | Criterion is met fully and compellingly; clear depth of understanding and evidence throughout. |
| 4 (Very good) | Criterion is well addressed with only minor gaps. |
| 3 (Good) | Criterion is addressed adequately but lacks depth or detail in places. |
| 2 (Fair) | Criterion is only partially addressed; connection is weak or unclear. |
| 1 (Poor) | Criterion is barely addressed or missing. |
Each judge scores all five criteria; scores are weighted and totalled. The highest overall weighted score wins. In the event of a tie, the panel will give preference to the submission demonstrating the strongest evidence of real community impact (Criterion 5).
Guidance for Applicants
Strong submissions will typically answer these questions:
Disqualification
Submissions may be excluded if they:
Prize proudly sponsored by ELIA Wellness.
Event Registration – click here to view the schedule
Event Schedule – click here to view the schedule
Home Page – click here for more info